Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:08:06 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: des@ofug.org Cc: keramida@FreeBSD.ORG, bde@zeta.org.au, freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/ln & WARNS=5 Message-ID: <20020715.110806.107966462.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <xzpele56m0u.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <xzpn0st6mjc.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020715.092804.90381918.imp@bsdimp.com> <xzpele56m0u.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <xzpele56m0u.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> writes: : "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> writes: : > In any event, sizeof(var) is the BSD way of saying that. : : Not according to bde + a significant amount of source code. I think you are wrong. This has come up before and the result was sizeof(var). Don't change ln.c away from that. ln.c is mostly bsd code already, and I know that NetBSD/OpenBSD do it as sizeof(var) most of the time. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020715.110806.107966462.imp>