Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 11:56:43 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: More if_ath churn coming your way! Message-ID: <AANLkTikWQ4G6P-ePSDv6eXpUfnZ7vvDTSqSGr5sB4Pxe@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikBpHcimOvSGdppc9CdhWguZNbTUEwan%2BQ172QT@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTikBpHcimOvSGdppc9CdhWguZNbTUEwan%2BQ172QT@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20 January 2011 13:51, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm in the process of merging in the non-intrusive changes to the > if_ath code into -HEAD. Ok, so I lied - the ANI changes were slightly intrusive. But all in all the code was just shuffled around a bit. Someone's reported that the AR9285 was once stable but now isn't. I'd really appreciate it if others who are using AR9280/AR9285 chipsets would test this out and get back to me. I'd like to make sure I fix all regressions before I start bringing over more code from ath9k in preparation for enabling the basic 802.11n support for testing. Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikWQ4G6P-ePSDv6eXpUfnZ7vvDTSqSGr5sB4Pxe>