Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 06:21:04 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Cc: julian@whistle.com, gibbs@plutotech.com, tlambert@primenet.com, nate@mt.sri.com, bde@zeta.org.au, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new timeout routines Message-ID: <199709240621.XAA05226@usr07.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <199709231452.IAA07122@rocky.mt.sri.com> from "Nate Williams" at Sep 23, 97 08:52:51 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > These were my thoughts while reading the paper. I was a little > > dissapointed that you didn't implement the compatible interface that > > they originally wrote. > > Now, this is something I don't understand. Why the need for the > 'cookies' in the drivers, since I don't see what it gains us? (Time to > go re-read the code and paper again.) Untimeout this particular timeout without traversing the whole list of possible timeouts. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709240621.XAA05226>