From owner-freebsd-chat  Wed Nov 12 18:15:48 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA03473
          for chat-outgoing; Wed, 12 Nov 1997 18:15:48 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat)
Received: from bachue.usc.unal.edu.co ([168.176.3.20])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA03468
          for <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 12 Nov 1997 18:15:43 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from giffunip@asme.org)
Received: from giffuni.inteng.com ([168.176.3.32])
          by bachue.usc.unal.edu.co (Netscape Messaging Server 3.0)
           with SMTP id AAA24455; Wed, 12 Nov 1997 21:18:46 +0500
Message-ID: <346A60F5.47BDC3B9@asme.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 02:07:49 +0000
From: "Pedro Giffuni S." <giffunip@asme.org>
Organization: U. Nacional de Colombia
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.2-RELEASE i386)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eivind Eklund <perhaps@yes.no>
CC: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Newest Pentium bug (fatal)
References: <199711110620.XAA15169@rocky.mt.sri.com>
		<199711110645.XAA02334@usr03.primenet.com>
		<199711111652.JAA16566@rocky.mt.sri.com>
		<199711111836.TAA22576@bitbox.follo.net>
		<3468B7E9.5FB8A39D@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
		<199711120002.BAA23398@bitbox.follo.net>
		<34690A37.236C9A1B@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> <199711122019.VAA28109@bitbox.follo.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Eivind Eklund wrote:
> 
> 
> I'm very uncertain what level you want 'explanations' on - if you
> could clarify, I can try to pour from my never-ending amount of wisdom
> ;-)  (Meaning that I can possibly throw you a pointer).
> 
Love is one typical example...Two men can behave exactly in a similar
manner while dating a lady. Asume that socio-economical conditions are
also similar. No scientific law will determine why this woman will
select one man over the other (BTW, they almost never choose the
fittest).
In the subatomic world scientific laws will also become useless if you
go behind certain size.
In general the things you really want to know can not be modelled
scientifically..either because there are way too many variables, or
because it is really impossible.
Also remember most of the scientific laws we use daily are FALSE. Newton
was wrong, and a physicist friend of mine commented that Maxwell is
wrong. Science always reduces to vulgar aproximations of reality (well
not so vulgar).

> [1] It is very, very, very rare.

I agree, Demonic posession is very, very, rare but seeing it in a
certain perspective it could be something very positive for an
individual: It PROVES at a personal level the existance of God. It so
evident that satan prefers other methods.


	Pedro.