Date: 04 Feb 1999 11:19:05 -0600 From: Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.org> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Christoph Kukulies <kuku@gilberto.physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: freebsd having a spec? Message-ID: <8690eeqe7q.fsf@detlev.UUCP> In-Reply-To: Eivind Eklund's message of "Thu, 4 Feb 1999 15:50:18 %2B0100" References: <199902041410.PAA10604@gilberto.physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE> <19990204155018.A8749@bitbox.follo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> I was asked today whether FreeBSD has something like a >> 'specification'. Seems to be the hobby of buying departments in >> larger institutions to ask for that. SCO I was told has one. >> I pointed them to www.freebsd.org, at least what the Y2K >> statement is concerned, but specs wouldn't be bad, also, I think. > Get hold of the SCO 'spec' and write something similar for FreeBSD - > if it is good, I'm pretty sure we'll endorse it as 'official' :-) > Eivind, who would really like to get a kernel API spec... Don't you run -current, Eivind? Specification of kernel for FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT: Kernel behavior is undefined under all circumstances. :-) Cheers, joelh -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8690eeqe7q.fsf>