Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      04 Feb 1999 11:19:05 -0600
From:      Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.org>
To:        Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        Christoph Kukulies <kuku@gilberto.physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: freebsd having a spec?
Message-ID:  <8690eeqe7q.fsf@detlev.UUCP>
In-Reply-To: Eivind Eklund's message of "Thu, 4 Feb 1999 15:50:18 %2B0100"
References:  <199902041410.PAA10604@gilberto.physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE> <19990204155018.A8749@bitbox.follo.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> I was asked today whether FreeBSD has something like a 
>> 'specification'. Seems to be the hobby of buying departments in
>> larger institutions to ask for that. SCO I was told has one.
>> I pointed them to www.freebsd.org, at least what the Y2K
>> statement is concerned, but specs wouldn't be bad, also, I think.
> Get hold of the SCO 'spec' and write something similar for FreeBSD -
> if it is good, I'm pretty sure we'll endorse it as 'official' :-)
> Eivind, who would really like to get a kernel API spec...

Don't you run -current, Eivind?

   Specification of kernel for FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT:
   Kernel behavior is undefined under all circumstances.

:-)

Cheers,
joelh

-- 
Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org
   Fourth law of programming:
   Anything that can go wrong wi
sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8690eeqe7q.fsf>