From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Feb 4 09:19:35 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA19369 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 09:19:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from detlev.UUCP (70-sweet.camalott.com [208.239.153.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA19351; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 09:19:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joelh@gnu.org) Received: (from joelh@localhost) by detlev.UUCP (8.9.2/8.9.1) id LAA22816; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 11:19:06 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from joelh) To: Eivind Eklund Cc: Christoph Kukulies , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: freebsd having a spec? References: <199902041410.PAA10604@gilberto.physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE> <19990204155018.A8749@bitbox.follo.net> From: Joel Ray Holveck Date: 04 Feb 1999 11:19:05 -0600 In-Reply-To: Eivind Eklund's message of "Thu, 4 Feb 1999 15:50:18 +0100" Message-ID: <8690eeqe7q.fsf@detlev.UUCP> Lines: 24 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >> I was asked today whether FreeBSD has something like a >> 'specification'. Seems to be the hobby of buying departments in >> larger institutions to ask for that. SCO I was told has one. >> I pointed them to www.freebsd.org, at least what the Y2K >> statement is concerned, but specs wouldn't be bad, also, I think. > Get hold of the SCO 'spec' and write something similar for FreeBSD - > if it is good, I'm pretty sure we'll endorse it as 'official' :-) > Eivind, who would really like to get a kernel API spec... Don't you run -current, Eivind? Specification of kernel for FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT: Kernel behavior is undefined under all circumstances. :-) Cheers, joelh -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message