From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Oct 26 22:39:03 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA19204
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 22:39:03 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers)
Received: from trojanhorse.ml.org (mdean.vip.best.com [206.86.94.101])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA19199
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 22:39:01 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jamil@trojanhorse.ml.org)
Received: from localhost (jamil@localhost)
	by trojanhorse.ml.org (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA01544;
	Sun, 26 Oct 1997 22:37:47 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 22:37:47 -0800 (PST)
From: "Jamil J. Weatherbee" <jamil@trojanhorse.ml.org>
To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu>
cc: Alfred Perlstein <perlsta@cs.sunyit.edu>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Parity Ram
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971026213216.10179C-100000@picnic.mat.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971026223720.1542A-100000@trojanhorse.ml.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



How about ECC in ram, like object checksums on the HP 48.