From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 18 14:51:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09BF016A403 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:51:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from burk@sumail.ru) Received: from mxob.su29.ru (mxob.su29.ru [81.200.9.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A09643CA2 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:49:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from burk@sumail.ru) Received: from [10.10.9.49] (helo=[192.168.1.11]) by mail.su29.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GwIc7-000KBV-EF; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:33:07 +0300 Message-ID: <4586988E.3010008@sumail.ru> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:33:02 +0300 From: gb User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marwan Sultan References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Original-SMTP-From: burk@sumail.ru X-Original-SMTP-To: dead_line@hotmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wireless 3945 status? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:51:09 -0000 Hi all, This would really interest me as well. I was forced to put linux on the laptop for the time being so that I could use the wireless. Even with that I had a small struggle. Is this Microsoft doing a old boys network with the hardware vendors, or is it just that the hardware vendors are too lazy to support open source? On another machine I had to fight with the bloody ATI video card. Does not seem fair, I am sure that there are more and more Freebsd and linux desktop users out there, why can't the vendors just give us a choice. cheers G