Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 10:11:43 -0500 From: Daren Desjardins <desjardins@canada.com> To: Dag-Erling =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ssh no longer connecting automatically Message-ID: <1081177903.31932.7.camel@lithium.stabilia.com> In-Reply-To: <xzp1xn66sr2.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <20040221202305.GA78752@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <000e01c3f8bc$9ee42dc0$efe8fea9@unixsmith.com> <20040325023251.GA61864@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <xzpd671ayqk.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040325225859.GA22615@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <xzpisgsf11n.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040402160232.GB68803@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <xzpu102pdc1.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040402164928.GA70822@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <1080935099.343.14.camel@lithium.stabilia.com> <xzp1xn66sr2.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I should also add, that I am unable to connect to a Linux 2.4 box running OpenSSH 3.5p1. Whats the easiest way to compare the two dirs? Just want a recursive ls on them? I think its some kind of library issue... I noticed the two machines that are having issues have 'openssl-0.9.7d' installed as a port... -If I copy a working copy of ssh from a 4.9r box it still gives the error -If I download the newest OpenSSH directly and compile it, it works -If I make the openssh port, it works -If I cvsup to stable, it fails -If I cvsup to release, it fails On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 15:15, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > Daren Desjardins <desjardins@canada.com> writes: > > The server is 4.9release, client is 4.9 stable. I have both base ssh an= d > > openssh 3.8p1 installed, both of which have the same error connecting t= o > > hosts. >=20 > OK, so 4.9-RELEASE can talk to 4.9-RELEASE and 4.9-STABLE can talk to > 4.9-STABLE, but 4.9-STABLE can't talk to 4.9-RELEASE? >=20 > The strange thing is that there have been practically no changes in > OpenSSH or OpenSSL since 4.9-RELEASE, until OpenSSL 0.9.7d was MFCed > earlier today. The only changes in OpenSSH are a documentation nit > and a patch for a low-impact memory leak. >=20 > Could you compare src/crypto and src/secure on the two machines? >=20 > DES
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1081177903.31932.7.camel>