From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 19 17:23:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9629316A40F; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:23:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.ciam.ru (ns.ciam.ru [213.247.195.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 215EC43D9A; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:22:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [87.240.16.199] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by mail.ciam.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x) id 1Gabb2-000HD6-Ul; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:22:21 +0400 Message-ID: <4537B44C.3080500@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:22:20 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergey Matveychuk , freebsd-java@freebsd.org References: <453669AA.8070808@FreeBSD.org> <20061019160114.GA94589@wec.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20061019160114.GA94589@wec.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: the best category X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:23:17 -0000 Oliver Lietz wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2006 19:51 schrieb Sergey Matveychuk: >> >> What do you think, what is the best primary category for >> >> http://quintanasoft.com/dumbster/? >> >> >> >> mail - since a simple fake SMTP server >> >> devel - since it's a test unit for developing >> >> java - since it's java class for java application > > > > It fits in all categories. But dumbster is buggy and it looks like it is no > > longer maintained. Latest version is from April 4th, 2005. > > There is a good replacement called Wiser (part of subethasmtp). > > http://subethasmtp.tigris.org/ > > > > Dumbster is a SMTP server for testing and development. I suggest to put it NOT > > into the ports. Leave handling of such libraries to maven (m2). Hmm. Can you explain what do you mean 'buggy'? I see it does things it should. And a library I'd like to port run tests with it. So I'd like to start from dumbster. We can have both dumbster and subethasmtp in ports. -- Dixi. Sem.