From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Mar 28 07:01:12 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA24109
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 28 Mar 1998 07:01:12 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA24097;
          Sat, 28 Mar 1998 07:00:58 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au)
Received: (from bde@localhost)
	by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA02302;
	Sun, 29 Mar 1998 01:58:52 +1100
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 1998 01:58:52 +1100
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199803281458.BAA02302@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: ache@nagual.pp.ru, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: gcc in -current still broken
Cc: bde@FreeBSD.ORG, jdp@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>Do we need to return to old assembler generation model or moving to new
>one is intentional action? If we switch to new model, is assembler patch

I think John's patch for `as' is sufficient, but haven't checked.

Bruce

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message