From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 8 13:56:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717AA1065678; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 13:56:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 855E38FC16; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 13:56:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb34 with SMTP id 34so674850wyb.13 for ; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 06:56:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=+yB+D7tY1OGSUmE/RvS1L5Q0/J3wkcsLvy3XlR4SWmM=; b=W8c05ShkDF5wSgIlbKDHjO76v7YNeVjS8VQcr6dh65BlVdh4y33OWIBgBhrxslfeI9 Hq9JxbKhIJMth3OR92GMLAnPVZxWrltMzEQ6bkh8zoirnf4hy0XOFYDjk3Nrfsm5naRu 3cOPhrqkn3lLLP9DLeKiyFWuGdBF8br+/ZIv4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=uVu/iVfmQ7nASIFltIpp9TZiE+v2VaM9iusZS7Kfrek5v4fvWXrdiQovQcI7OBvSrh PLxWVbXmWAslbAeTyE9Aqs4BNShlHKs3vsp5BmkaKvM3K6E2glwV8uslLt9nM3TVadIZ lpMqMPhM/nYrUEZCcm5g4hLLSLy4eNrF8da0w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.136.80 with SMTP id q16mr6481811wbt.93.1278595744515; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 06:29:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.172.14 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 06:29:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100708132111.GO31442@droso.net> References: <201007081251.o68CpcBF050697@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100708132111.GO31442@droso.net> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 13:29:04 +0000 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: Erwin Lansing Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Brendan Fabeny Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/lzma Makefile ports/archivers/paq Makefile ports/archivers/ppmd-7z Makefile ports/devel/abi-compliance-checker Makefile ports/devel/api-sanity-autotest Makefile ports/devel/distorm Makefile ports/devel/libdisasm ... X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:56:43 -0000 On 7/8/10, Erwin Lansing wrote: > On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 12:51:38PM +0000, Brendan Fabeny wrote: >> bf 2010-07-08 12:51:38 UTC >> >> FreeBSD ports repository >> >> Modified files: >> archivers/lzma Makefile >> archivers/paq Makefile >> archivers/ppmd-7z Makefile >> devel/abi-compliance-checker Makefile >> devel/api-sanity-autotest Makefile >> devel/distorm Makefile >> devel/libdisasm Makefile >> devel/py-distorm Makefile >> devel/udis86 Makefile >> games/xwordpy Makefile >> graphics/exact-image Makefile >> graphics/tesseract Makefile >> math/R Makefile >> math/dieharder Makefile >> math/gsl Makefile >> math/jags Makefile >> math/librandlib Makefile >> math/libranlip Makefile >> math/lll_spect Makefile >> math/maxima Makefile >> math/prng Makefile >> math/rngstreams Makefile >> math/testu01 Makefile >> math/unuran Makefile >> net-mgmt/kismet Makefile >> print/gv Makefile >> print/flpsed Makefile >> print/gsview Makefile >> textproc/libtre Makefile >> textproc/py-libtre Makefile >> textproc/wv Makefile >> textproc/unrtf Makefile >> www/dillo2 Makefile >> Log: >> Change my ports to use my FreeBSD.org email address. > > This is a sweeping commit explicitly not allowed during a slush. Also, > I am not seeing approval by one of your mentors. Please take more care. > > -erwin > >> >> Revision Changes Path >> 1.41 +1 -1 ports/archivers/lzma/Makefile >> 1.17 +1 -1 ports/archivers/paq/Makefile >> 1.13 +1 -1 ports/archivers/ppmd-7z/Makefile >> 1.10 +2 -2 ports/devel/abi-compliance-checker/Makefile >> 1.2 +2 -2 ports/devel/api-sanity-autotest/Makefile >> 1.5 +1 -1 ports/devel/distorm/Makefile >> 1.9 +1 -1 ports/devel/libdisasm/Makefile >> 1.10 +1 -1 ports/devel/py-distorm/Makefile >> 1.6 +1 -1 ports/devel/udis86/Makefile >> 1.6 +1 -1 ports/games/xwordpy/Makefile >> 1.17 +1 -1 ports/graphics/exact-image/Makefile >> 1.12 +1 -1 ports/graphics/tesseract/Makefile >> 1.90 +1 -1 ports/math/R/Makefile >> 1.13 +1 -1 ports/math/dieharder/Makefile >> 1.48 +1 -1 ports/math/gsl/Makefile >> 1.20 +1 -1 ports/math/jags/Makefile >> 1.19 +1 -1 ports/math/librandlib/Makefile >> 1.2 +2 -2 ports/math/libranlip/Makefile >> 1.3 +2 -2 ports/math/lll_spect/Makefile >> 1.57 +1 -1 ports/math/maxima/Makefile >> 1.2 +2 -2 ports/math/prng/Makefile >> 1.4 +1 -1 ports/math/rngstreams/Makefile >> 1.7 +1 -1 ports/math/testu01/Makefile >> 1.10 +1 -1 ports/math/unuran/Makefile >> 1.28 +1 -1 ports/net-mgmt/kismet/Makefile >> 1.14 +1 -1 ports/print/flpsed/Makefile >> 1.7 +1 -1 ports/print/gsview/Makefile >> 1.68 +1 -1 ports/print/gv/Makefile >> 1.53 +1 -1 ports/textproc/libtre/Makefile >> 1.5 +1 -1 ports/textproc/py-libtre/Makefile >> 1.22 +1 -1 ports/textproc/unrtf/Makefile >> 1.56 +1 -1 ports/textproc/wv/Makefile >> 1.51 +1 -1 ports/www/dillo2/Makefile > -- > Erwin Lansing http://droso.org > Prediction is very difficult > especially about the future erwin@FreeBSD.org > Sorry, I'll do so. I forgot to mention in the commit message that makc@ gave his approval, and miwi@ did not object to the commit. And my reading of the criteria for sweeping change suggested that this would be admissible because it was a "cosmetic change", mostly to leaf ports (with the exception of textproc/wv). If I misunderstood what is considered to be cosmetic, please let me know. I wanted to get this in because I've already missed the auto-assign of two PRs related to ports that I maintain. Regards, b.