Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Apr 2002 05:58:01 -0700
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
To:        sos@freebsd.dk
Cc:        msch@snafu.de, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ATA errors on recent -current
Message-ID:  <3CBEC2D9.436485D0@mindspring.com>
References:  <200204180706.g3I76HmJ046472@freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"S=F8ren Schmidt" wrote:
> It seems Terry Lambert wrote:
> > My other hunch is that there will need to be a channel reserved
> > for "reset" commands to be queued to the disk, so that you can
> > queue more commands to it later (e.g. can't connect to send the
> > reset because of the already disconnected commands in progress).
> =

> Terry, read the ATA spec, it doesn't work that way, tags on
> ATA is very different from tags on SCSI, and beside a reset
> is not a command, but a bit in a HW port..

I didn't mean for the reset itself, I meant for the process.  You
can't "take back" writes that are in progress and not acknowledged,
in order to retry them after the reset, so as to not lose data.

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3CBEC2D9.436485D0>