From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 3 04:39:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1459D480 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 04:39:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com (mail-pa0-f42.google.com [209.85.220.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB3976D4 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 04:39:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id fb1so1737484pad.1 for ; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 20:39:01 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ztSZjoa/c3/h6Pml0YyS326dUEkbSbE6DRxt+xR3dtc=; b=JcU53g026oOCQL5QQhxcZNRNNFXFNH4jjQFaFERlim9FN/5o+GHdhuYo7haObAD0dl G6EtQPDfdBVGAK2h0oAnzKYJC8/KRC+ZXiU4i6FKa8t9DvfyFU9WKfSqduSO6zDw9utp s2ozNCXiyUTST2EpZu4BcYWww17cc7HD73oeKAgZTHQEve+3wiBTgHQyZEINjOb1QqAb S8UuVRouCdmuN9RUX7pIRyJfNughBFlAZ9pnpa1NMP4i/zDVtPrrLoSl6YZc0+KKN7hu cUjWc+XHyyy8v13iWq11Cp8xgYm0YLl7+QzF4SJwLxK4Ud6ibyAx7gbfgont75NTTxkj vjLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk25kUMYNl3WYmuX2fI/x/JHEqJMR985/7mWUjdRpm9jvQGKPC3QzjiC6qhSW2NhilpqzgE X-Received: by 10.68.7.66 with SMTP id h2mr17127470pba.91.1393821541000; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 20:39:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.133.170.126] (z88l218.static.ctm.net. [202.175.88.218]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qq5sm30976305pbb.24.2014.03.02.20.38.59 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 02 Mar 2014 20:39:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <53140762.1080603@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 12:38:58 +0800 From: Julien Grall User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warner Losh Subject: Re: Device Tree mailing References: <1392222417.13563.93.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <5313E532.2070608@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 04:39:08 -0000 On 03/03/14 10:45, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Mar 2, 2014, at 7:13 PM, Julien Grall wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> A device tree ML has been created to discuss about binding specification. > > Already subscribed a while ago :) > >> As discussed on a previous thread [1], FreeBSD device tree binding doesn't always match bindings used by all the boards. It prevents FreeBSD to boot out-of-box (e.g. without a modified DT). > > A situation we’d like to correct. I believe the issues from that thread had been > corrected (it was a simple bug), and generally we are striving to have the standard > DTB work correctly. While we may fall short in a couple of areas, those are > simple bugs that should be highlighted. I haven't check the FreeBSD for a month now. I saw that Nathan has reworked FDT code since this thread, thanks to him. The bug where FreeBSD were not able to deal with #interrupt-cells > 2 seems to be fixed (I haven't had time to verify it). I think the issue on device enumeration from the DT is still there. I will have to give a try to be sure. >> It might be interested to have some people from BSD on this mailing list. > > Yes, the more the merrier. > > Warner > >> Regards, >> >> [1] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-xen/2014-January/001974.html >> >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: [Fwd: New mailing lists] >> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:26:57 +0000 >> From: Ian Campbell >> Organisation: Citrix Systems, Inc. >> To: Julien Grall >> >> Can you forward this to whoever @ NetBSD you think might be interested? > > Is NetBSD going to start using FDT now? Good question, I think Ian meant FreeBSD here. ;) -- Julien Grall