Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:45:36 +0300
From:      Manolis Kiagias <sonicy@otenet.gr>
To:        Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
Cc:        Bob Johnson <fbsdlists@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Questions <questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Why is Qemu not in Handbook
Message-ID:  <4BC61B60.9080605@otenet.gr>
In-Reply-To: <p2k6201873e1004141055v1948006dv469c3c035fa164d1@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <t2p54db43991004140824yc08f9f6fk8da053947828a46@mail.gmail.com> <p2k6201873e1004141055v1948006dv469c3c035fa164d1@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14/04/2010 8:55 μ.μ., Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Bob Johnson <fbsdlists@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> For years I used Qemu to run Windows XP under FreeBSD. It worked fine.
>> A few months ago I saw a message that VirtualBox was now working
>> correctly under FreeBSD. So I tried to install it and it wouldn't
>> build. But that's not the actual topic of my question. In the process
>> of trying to install VirtualBox I noticed that Qemu is not mentioned
>> in the Handbook. It's not even mentioned under "Other Virtualization
>> Options".  So my actual question is:
>>
>> Why is Qemu not mentioned in the Handbook?
>>
>> There is already a PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=127923
>>
>> Even just a mention with a link to http://wiki.freebsd.org/qemu would
>> be helpful.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>     
> you mean like this?
>
> http://www.freebsdgr.org/handbook-mine/virtualization-host.html
>
> I don't know why it's not on the official one, IIRC it used to be.
>
>   
This is not the "official" Handbook, but my own patch queue, and yes it
has been in there for too long.
Hopefully I will have a lot more free time in a few weeks, there are
more patches like this that need to get reviewed and committed.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BC61B60.9080605>