Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 12:52:05 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.org> To: Jamie Howard <howardjp@wam.umd.edu> Cc: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: libcompat proposition Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908131251160.16650-100000@janus.syracuse.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9908131154180.27012-100000@dragon.ham.muohio.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Jamie Howard wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
> > Close, but what I said was more along the lines that following NetBSD's
> > footsteps on issues relating to portability is _seldom_ a bad idea.
>
> I was close enough that you know the exact quote so I think I did alright.
>
> Back to the point, just stick it in libc :)
Direct veto by core member (Jordan) prevents this. I really think it
should be in libcompat, the more I consider every option.
>
> Jamie
>
Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___
green@FreeBSD.org _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ | _ \._ \ |) |
http://www.FreeBSD.org/ _ |___/___/___/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9908131251160.16650-100000>