Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 14:04:04 +0900 From: itojun@itojun.org To: dg@root.com Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: odd xxget() in some network drivers Message-ID: <19050.869807044@itojun.csl.sony.co.jp> In-Reply-To: David Greenman <dg@root.com>'s message of Thu, 24 Jul 1997 21:39:05 -0700. <199707250439.VAA16721@implode.root.com> References: <199707250439.VAA16721@implode.root.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> ???? I did not write MHLEN <= len. Why len>MHLEN and MHLEN<len >> should result in different situation? > Sorry, brain fart. You're correct...there's a reason why we write it the >other way: so people like me don't get confused. :-) hmm, I see. >> I prefer that too, however only very few people seems to check >> problem reports in a regular basis... I do need to wait almost >> forever. <sigh> > In this case it's better to contact the author of the driver(s) directly. >Non-bug reports are easily ignored otherwise. The problem makes it very hard to implement ipsec protocol handling routine, so I raised this question. itojun
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19050.869807044>