Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 21:56:37 -0400 From: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG>, Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Subject: Re: 64 bit times revisited.. Message-ID: <20011026215637.B2283@coffee.q9media.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.011026182323.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.ORG on Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:23PM -0700 References: <XFMail.011026181705.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <XFMail.011026182323.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> writes: > My bad. C90 requires that time_t fit into a long according to Garrett. POSIX > requires it to be either an integer or floating point with the fractional part > zero according to his mail as well. It appears they've corrected this in C99. Garrett, can you confirm this? Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011026215637.B2283>