From owner-freebsd-current Tue Dec 10 21:47:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE5837B401 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 21:47:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.identd.net (matrix.identd.net [64.172.21.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5ED1C43EA9 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 21:47:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mtm@identd.net) Received: (qmail 24054 invoked by uid 1007); 11 Dec 2002 05:47:54 -0000 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 21:47:54 -0800 From: Mike Makonnen To: Gordon Tetlow Cc: "Daniel C. Sobral" , current@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org, Doug Barton Subject: Re: RC NG, ntp and routed Message-ID: <20021211054754.GA23972@matrix.identd.net> References: <3DF4996E.1040706@tcoip.com.br> <20021210024350.GC16008@matrix.identd.net> <20021210162208.GJ45512@roark.gnf.org> <3DF61DE4.9070205@tcoip.com.br> <20021210225014.GA22267@matrix.identd.net> <20021211002318.GT45512@roark.gnf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021211002318.GT45512@roark.gnf.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/4.7-STABLE (i386) Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:23:18PM -0800, Gordon Tetlow wrote: >=20 > Ideally, ntpd should require NETWORKING and that should solve all problem= s. > The real problem is that routed is included with DAEMON, not NETWORKING. I > think that's the real problem and judging that routed is in /sbin, we cou= ld > probably move it there without a problem. That sounds like a good idea. According to current NETWORKING requirements = it just means the network interfaces are brought up, but routing seems to be a reasonable requirement as well. I can't think of a good reason why it would not be a good idea. Maybe we could move the other routing daemons there as well (from /usr/sbin)?=20 Cheers. --=20 Mike Makonnen | GPG-KEY: http://www.identd.net/~mtm/mtm.asc mtm@identd.net | Fingerprint: D228 1A6F C64E 120A A1C9 A3AA DAE1 E2AF DBCC= 68B9 --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE99tGJ2uHir9vMaLkRAhiNAJ9cVs9BWCkXU92zcymw1kRhjaI6TQCg2y9W F6K8cM/eXlnjFXlLgPOHXrw= =CqSs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message