From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Jul 18 18:21:01 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69619AE49D for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 18:21:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmg@gold.funkthat.com) Received: from gold.funkthat.com (gate2.funkthat.com [208.87.223.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gate2.funkthat.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F39416C4FE for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 18:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmg@gold.funkthat.com) Received: from gold.funkthat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gold.funkthat.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x6IIKpdA040118 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 18 Jul 2019 11:20:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmg@gold.funkthat.com) Received: (from jmg@localhost) by gold.funkthat.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x6IIKpbD040117; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 11:20:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmg) Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 11:20:51 -0700 From: John-Mark Gurney To: bob prohaska Cc: Jamie Landeg-Jones , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lethargic rpi3, but seemingly still running Message-ID: <20190718182050.GL2342@funkthat.com> Mail-Followup-To: bob prohaska , Jamie Landeg-Jones , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: <20190718034838.GA1921@www.zefox.net> <201907180958.x6I9wBF8075274@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> <20190718151858.GB4325@www.zefox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190718151858.GB4325@www.zefox.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p7 amd64 X-PGP-Fingerprint: D87A 235F FB71 1F3F 55B7 ED9B D5FF 5A51 C0AC 3D65 X-Files: The truth is out there X-URL: https://www.funkthat.com/ X-Resume: https://www.funkthat.com/~jmg/resume.html X-TipJar: bitcoin:13Qmb6AeTgQecazTWph4XasEsP7nGRbAPE X-to-the-FBI-CIA-and-NSA: HI! HOW YA DOIN? can i haz chizburger? User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (gold.funkthat.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 18 Jul 2019 11:20:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: F39416C4FE X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jmg@gold.funkthat.com designates 208.87.223.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jmg@gold.funkthat.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.991,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[funkthat.com]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: gold.funkthat.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.82)[-0.819,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.68)[ip: (-1.75), ipnet: 208.87.216.0/21(-0.88), asn: 32354(-0.70), country: US(-0.05)]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[jmg@funkthat.com,jmg@gold.funkthat.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:32354, ipnet:208.87.216.0/21, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[jmg@funkthat.com,jmg@gold.funkthat.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 18:21:01 -0000 bob prohaska wrote this message on Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 08:18 -0700: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:58:11AM +0100, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: > > bob prohaska wrote: > > > > > Every once in a while bsdtar will use a fraction of a percent of cpu, but > > > that seems to be all that's happening. The timestamp updates every other > > > second, typing echoes as expected but something like pwd takes twenty > > > seconds to answer. The controlling terminal for portmaster-devel has been > > > sitting at > > > > What's your I/O like? > > > > systat -v 1 > > > > The machine got past the bottleneck and is running normally now, but > I'll try it the next time the machine bogs down. Does systat use a > different measurement method than top? top doesn't like block device io... iostat or systat -v 1 will do that. -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."