Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 14:47:58 +0000 (GMT) From: spork <spork@super-g.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: CVS/ports question Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970514144130.7590B-100000@super-g.inch.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, I blindly did a CVS update of the /usr/ports hierarchy using the example file in /usr/share/examples/cvsup on a 2.2.1 machine. Looking at the CVS log, I saw that all it did was neatly descend into each directory and delete the Makefile for each port (I chose to install the ports collection during a re-install). Going through and actually *reading* the ports cvsupfile, I see it's for ports-current, which I suppose explains the above behaviour. So my question is, can I use CVSUP to get ports-2.2?? I really like having everything local. I also noticed that dependancies are now fetched automatically, which is very nice... Thanks, Charles
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.970514144130.7590B-100000>