Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 20:20:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@bonkers.video-collage.com> To: rafan@FreeBSD.org (Rong-En Fan) Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: conf/71254: ncurses: xterm vs. cons* termtypes or sc(4) Message-ID: <200704300020.l3U0KXKT044401@bonkers.video-collage.com> In-Reply-To: <200704290809.l3T89I55001072@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Synopsis: ncurses: xterm vs. cons* termtypes or sc(4) > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: rafan > State-Changed-When: Sun Apr 29 08:08:11 UTC 2007 > State-Changed-Why: > Dear submitter, > > Does this still occur in latest release, say 6.2-RELEASE > or in HEAD? Yes, it does still occur. Verifying it for itself is faster, than sending an e-mail with the question: inside an xterm bring up `vi' to edit a file with long lines. Triple-click on a long (one wrapping to the next line) line. Notice, that only part of the line gets highlighted by xterm. Opening the same file with less/more has the same effect. Cat-ing, however, does not -- presumably, because cat does not use [n]curses. Yours, -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200704300020.l3U0KXKT044401>