From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 14 11:08:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5044E93 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 11:08:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from florent@peterschmitt.fr) Received: from peterschmitt.fr (peterschmitt.fr [5.135.177.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC0E11F3 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 11:08:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.29.180.39] (unknown [194.214.114.46]) by peterschmitt.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 408B7A1DD for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:08:08 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <51BAF9EE.5000608@peterschmitt.fr> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:09:34 +0200 From: Florent Peterschmitt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130518 Icedove/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Rebuild all ports for perl minor version update? References: <88415.98533.bm@smtp104.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <88415.98533.bm@smtp104.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="----enig2HRLABCDBJKCWNTJJRDVC" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 11:08:03 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) ------enig2HRLABCDBJKCWNTJJRDVC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le 14/06/2013 10:12, Thomas Mueller a =E9crit : > I see in the $PORTSDIR/UPDATING file that perl has been updated. >=20 > perl5.16 has been updated from 5.16.2 to 5.16.3 . >=20 > Since this is only (?) a minor-version update, why should it be necessa= ry to upgrade all ports that depend on perl? >=20 > portmaster -r perl >=20 > In that case, why didn't they go to perl 5.18? >=20 > Since so many ports depend on perl, and png too, maybe they should have= updated perl and png (to 1.6.x) at the same time, then two massive portm= aster or portupgrade runs could have been done together, as one even bigg= er portmaster or portupgrade run? > =20 >=20 > Tom If you don't want to rebuild *really* everything depending on perl, you can first give a shot en perl modules: pkg info | sed -rn 's/^(p5.*)-[0-9]+.*/\1/p' | xargs portmaster Maybe this can be done using only pkg query but I'm too lazy for the moment 8-} But you should know that it can make other perl dependent ports not working anymore. --=20 Florent Peterschmitt | Please: florent@peterschmitt.fr | * Avoid HTML/RTF in E-mail. +33 (0)6 64 33 97 92 | * Send PDF for documents. http://florent.peterschmitt.fr | Thank you :) ------enig2HRLABCDBJKCWNTJJRDVC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRuvnuAAoJEMtO2Sol0IImB/AH/jFu05blPY15jbZtiSh0+Lxf IgVjIylhRjMHrBM54c97zj9ze+Rpwvxg4PSC569Vm+6vRb9xcrQgMTjd62Y1sMHW z41EwyZN0w1H1TkS4FYfHkXY8RMiTtnniiQbF1+FE+V0RKnqt9ZG7wGIXskG//sc tREWW3hyRIZ9NGAHBlRjJJAH8u4KHyshOWF16QRsj0X1jnYhTzMfkfgrHSKQiQnk USzCUTqekoL2Yx6fOJGRDy0Y8uo0qLRcP1Muuzg22xB7q3wmbzADohj8vuEWD33X 1EDowwx79uFua0rBTZUdJaPVPIZDrhuVa0x1GIsJfkFBMX30GSjoF78dz5QJ9bw= =Gfqn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------enig2HRLABCDBJKCWNTJJRDVC--