Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 00:32:19 +0200 From: "Cyrille Lefevre" <clefevre-lists@9online.fr> To: "Oliver Eikemeier" <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP - master/slave ports Message-ID: <066a01c454ba$f455a400$7890a8c0@dyndns.org> References: <1DC17B53-C0A2-11D8-9250-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Oliver Eikemeier" <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> wrote: > Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > > >> These appear to be slightly faster than the previous stats I posted. > >> Everything is pratically identical in user time. sys is where the > >> savings are being made. > > > > it's strange that this code (w/ no fork) is not much faster than 2 > > forks ! > > The benchmark is not really valid. Depending on your machine, > nearly everything will be in the cache. This is not true when > you have other stuff in the loop, like building the INDEX. well, of course, if the test is something like this : csh -c 'repeat 15000 make -V MASTERDIR -V MASTERPORTS' the measurement would not be so accurate :( Cyrille Lefevre. -- mailto:clefevre-lists@9online.fr
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?066a01c454ba$f455a400$7890a8c0>