From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 22 12:01:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F109D1065695 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:01:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661448FC1E for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id n8MC1W31031346; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:01:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8MC1WAS031345; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:01:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:01:32 +0200 From: Marius Strobl To: Gheorghe Ardelean Message-ID: <20090922120132.GG73777@alchemy.franken.de> References: <20090818192748.GA6585@alchemy.franken.de> <20090819161410.GA19351@alchemy.franken.de> <4A8DC0DF.4040701@networkz.ch> <4A8EDE72.6040703@networkz.ch> <20090821193740.GA66639@alchemy.franken.de> <20090826205905.GG94142@alchemy.franken.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Audio on Sunblade 100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:01:34 -0000 On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 07:23:28PM +0200, Gheorghe Ardelean wrote: > > > Hi Marius, > > On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Marius Strobl wrote: > > <...> > >Unfortunately, I'm currently out of ideas what could be > >the reason for the problem Christian is seeing. Given that > >what I have works fine on 2 of 3 Blade 100 and my Blade > >1500, I'll commit it once I had a chance to verify it > >doesn't break i386 though. It would be great however if > >you could try a slightly updated version of the patch at > >http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/t4dwave_M5451_32-bit.diff > >(MD5 hash: 7aaee2bfeab57c21ab23c98cf1c67f23) with one > >of your Blade 100. > > Tested and it works ok! > Thanks, I've committed it to head. Marius