From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 3 16:58:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C346F16A403 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:58:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff@seamanpaper.com) Received: from seamanpaper.com (seamanpaper.com [64.62.234.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 840F643D6E for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:58:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeff@seamanpaper.com) Received: from 66.152.240.162 ([66.152.240.162]) by seamanpaper.com for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 09:58:05 -0700 Message-ID: <4522969F.9010504@seamanpaper.com> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:58:07 -0400 From: Jeff Dickens Organization: Seaman Paper Company User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: optimal kernel options for VMWARE guest system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 16:58:11 -0000 I have some Freebsd systems that are running as VMware guests. I'd like to configure their kernels so as to minimize the overhead on the VMware host system. After reading and partially digesting the white paper on timekeeping in VMware virtual machines (http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vmware_timekeeping.pdf) it appears that I might want to make some changes. Has anyone addressed this issue?