From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 17 16:19:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8123B16A415; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 16:19:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy@athame.co.uk) Received: from hex.athame.co.uk (salama58.adsl.netsonic.fi [81.17.207.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA7243D6E; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 16:19:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andy@athame.co.uk) Received: from ping.int.athame.co.uk ([192.168.10.8]) by hex.athame.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Gl6R9-0006kl-MF; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 18:19:31 +0200 From: Andy Fawcett To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 18:19:33 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200611161509.53708.josh@tcbug.org> <200611171322.14121.andy@athame.co.uk> <20061117150336.GA89839@icarus.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <20061117150336.GA89839@icarus.home.lan> X-Face: ?fLK282oT!Ss!(krp%ft%TWfrkz*Mxz<2hwkRBzd); #D/=!=XjYKFBh1wVeov4K&<=?utf-8?q?Z6bi=5F=0A=09=7BBvAjk1diod2?=,DQo`Xz<\$~fX7B>U`u0HC\Gc+B9Hxu"bjBc16tg~i4.,2A1>=?utf-8?q?=7BrcRK=5Fi!i=0A=097e79f=7CT=3B9=23gfr=3DG1u=27xS=3D?=(}_NSP,Gs>HDq Cc: Jeremy Chadwick , Ivan Voras Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1-R-p10 and PHP 5.2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 16:19:34 -0000 On Friday 17 November 2006 17:03, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 01:22:13PM +0200, Andy Fawcett wrote: > > This is actually a known problem, documented on the PHP site. > > > > My nasty solution to deal with this is to have a "good" copy of > > extensions.ini saved, and I just copy it over after each update. I > > only need to modify it after adding or removing extensions. > > Can you provide the documentation to this known problem? > > Also, ale@, is this issue/known problem handled decently when > installing a php5 extension via ports? (It doesn't sound like it). > It almost sounds like we need some additional framework to give > each extension its own priority, thus when extensions.ini is edited, > sorting the extensions loaded by their priority. See: http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.recode.php http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.mysql.php for a couple of examples, see the "warning" sections. There are probably others too, I haven't dug much further. -- Andy Fawcett | andy@athame.co.uk | tap@kde.org "In an open world without walls and fences, | tap@lspace.org we wouldn't need Windows and Gates." -- anon | tap@fruitsalad.org