From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Aug 13  9:58: 0 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A55C31501A; Fri, 13 Aug 1999 09:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com)
Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com)
	by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1)
	id 11FKc2-000M5q-00; Fri, 13 Aug 1999 18:55:26 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: Peter Jeremy <jeremyp@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au>,
	hackers@FreeBSD.org, gram@cequrux.com
Subject: Re: New tests for test(1) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 13 Aug 1999 12:50:54 -0400."
             <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908131249210.16650-100000@janus.syracuse.net> 
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 18:55:26 +0200
Message-ID: <84928.934563326@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Fri, 13 Aug 1999 12:50:54 -0400, "Brian F. Feldman" wrote:

> I fully agree with this. If it can be cleanly added to the current test(1)
> (which it can), we should have it, even if it were JUST for the sake of
> portability.

Ah, but I'm not proposing that we add new functionality to the existing
test(1). The code gave me a head-ache. I'm proposing that we replace our
test(1) entirely.

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message