Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 12:12:33 -0700 From: Harshavardhana <harsha@harshavardhana.net> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@mail.turbofuzz.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD support being added to GlusterFS Message-ID: <CAAeUqd02pyWZhHmkSC1cauHL=qH_rU3gXs%2BDsHKJm3pjT5dhiA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <0F20AEEC-6244-42BC-815C-1440BBBDE664@mail.turbofuzz.com> References: <C647EDA1-EA93-4A66-B59D-3B5F959DC0E0@gluster.org> <6ADBB2BF-C7E8-4050-9278-2565A63D2EA8@gluster.org> <20140627070411.GI24440@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <0F20AEEC-6244-42BC-815C-1440BBBDE664@mail.turbofuzz.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The patches are pending review and will be pushed hopefully this week! - can i get these installed on a Virtualbox instance and test the failures? Do not understand what is "poudriere" build? - is it like building inside a chrooted environment? The changes regarding "/var/lib" to "/var/db" are not complete with the diff, in-fact inside the code - "DEFAULT_WORKDIR /var/lib/glusterd" is hard-coded - and its only complete until all the references point to "/var/db/glusterd" I will be making these changes this week. Is "/var/db" the directory we all agree upon for "glusterd" configuration files? On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Jordan Hubbard <jkh@mail.turbofuzz.com> w= rote: > > On Jun 27, 2014, at 12:04 AM, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> wrote= : > >> >> For you information here is my version: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/glusterfs.diff >> >> It is just missing the license bits >> >> if everyone here agrees I'll commit :) > > Unfortunately, I can=E2=80=99t get this to build under poudriere. It bui= lds fine outside of the build jail, but inside, it seems to get tripped up = on the patches. The previous version we also only got to build under poudr= iere by committing all sorts of terrible hacks against autogen.sh. FreeNA= S 9.3, of course, also uses poudriere to build all its ports. :) > > Is there any chance of possibly just getting the FreeBSD-specific changes= folded into the git repo (e.g. upstreamed) with suitable #ifdefs so that t= he port can be simplified a bit and hopefully made more poudriere friendly? > > Thanks, > > - Jordan > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=20 Religious confuse piety with mere ritual, the virtuous confuse regulation with outcomes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAAeUqd02pyWZhHmkSC1cauHL=qH_rU3gXs%2BDsHKJm3pjT5dhiA>