From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 14:38:51 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E4416A419 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 14:38:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from apvanderveen@att.net) Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6175213C46B for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 14:38:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from apvanderveen@att.net) Received: from t60.mydomain.home (cpe-72-231-141-22.nycap.res.rr.com[72.231.141.22]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11) with ESMTP id <20070805143850111002llb5e>; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 14:38:50 +0000 Message-ID: <46B5E0F8.7050405@att.net> Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 10:38:48 -0400 From: "Arend P. van der Veen" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070803) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: portsdb and cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 14:38:51 -0000 Hi, I have recently been having trouble with running portsdb after cvsup. I am running 6.2-RELEASE-p7. The approach that I had been using was: /usr/local/bin/cvsup -L 0 /usr/sup/supfile /usr/local/sbin/portsdb -Uu This had worked great until the emacs22 update. Now portsdb crashes due to the emacs entry in /etc/make.conf. However, I see very little chatter on the lists about this. I have started to wonder if the bulk of the community may be updating their ports differently. Upon some limited research I found that I could use: /usr/local/bin/cvsup -L 0 /usr/sup/supfile /usr/local/sbin/portsdb -Fu This work fine for me. I can then use tools such as pkg_version, pkg_delete, portinstall and portupgrade without any problems. My open ended question is what does the rest of the community do to update their ports collection? Thanks, Arend