From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 3 04:54:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D1D35F5 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 04:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f177.google.com (mail-ig0-f177.google.com [209.85.213.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E823583E for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 04:54:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f177.google.com with SMTP id ur14so1145688igb.4 for ; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 20:54:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=n12ymBnm5SyZ9vPfvH/OIvCnKALXTinZ1QUTXrOjuRA=; b=VRrmQGdWfd8oY1WIuPDkoKd1kn2A0hcoytETYXaYppPYTCiWIRbo80RMjMZ5FtUp6F dkDtFuvCzpKzFGMO5C5FN03DjxvcA+KaBfSGnuYgcuORdb4OQ53m5wRD7NPh7IBSfZc1 Y8jLACjeqE1hXwOixSW8ZBCpB89Zp1HGM3m+oYgxeUkqYbqBFEB9YO1Osp0blL2NAcN/ N3qEtpzN9LihsUFJHU48BI90IJI/nXqsUZb094WMjaolJWE0zX2OrbwilU8/Q5WiGRUZ MB9czG6Y+sqBUgfUdhX4j90PVfyshZVsdA5RTEV+gLMTJtkvC8WdT4i+p+Vjwwe4sCfp KqbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn5VRBdjY29Boi3iEV4lt/rBqaZEK7BKLvyphfYfJDD1Av7dlHSDZpnya7d1JiG80eDsCYq X-Received: by 10.42.40.83 with SMTP id k19mr24209970ice.3.1393822442203; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 20:54:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from netflix-mac.bsdimp.com (50-78-194-198-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [50.78.194.198]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pn6sm35677460igb.4.2014.03.02.20.54.01 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 02 Mar 2014 20:54:01 -0800 (PST) Sender: Warner Losh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\)) Subject: Re: Device Tree mailing From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <53140762.1080603@linaro.org> Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 21:54:03 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <1392222417.13563.93.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <5313E532.2070608@linaro.org> <53140762.1080603@linaro.org> To: Julien Grall X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874) Cc: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 04:54:09 -0000 On Mar 2, 2014, at 9:38 PM, Julien Grall = wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 03/03/14 10:45, Warner Losh wrote: >>=20 >> On Mar 2, 2014, at 7:13 PM, Julien Grall = wrote: >>=20 >>> Hello all, >>>=20 >>> A device tree ML has been created to discuss about binding = specification. >>=20 >> Already subscribed a while ago :) >>=20 >>> As discussed on a previous thread [1], FreeBSD device tree binding = doesn't always match bindings used by all the boards. It prevents = FreeBSD to boot out-of-box (e.g. without a modified DT). >>=20 >> A situation we=92d like to correct. I believe the issues from that = thread had been >> corrected (it was a simple bug), and generally we are striving to = have the standard >> DTB work correctly. While we may fall short in a couple of areas, = those are >> simple bugs that should be highlighted. >=20 > I haven't check the FreeBSD for a month now. I saw that Nathan has = reworked FDT code since this thread, thanks to him. >=20 > The bug where FreeBSD were not able to deal with #interrupt-cells > 2 = seems to be fixed (I haven't had time to verify it). Cool! If there=92s a problem, please let us know=85 Atmel (my main focus = these days for somewhat crazy reasons) uses interrupt-cell =3D=3D 3, but I haven=92t tested it to know that it works, just that it doesn=92t = crash right away... > I think the issue on device enumeration from the DT is still there. I = will have to give a try to be sure. Yea, there still might be ordering issues there. We=92re working on a = possible solution to that which works for Atmel and should work for = others. Warner >>> It might be interested to have some people from BSD on this mailing = list. >>=20 >> Yes, the more the merrier. >>=20 >> Warner >>=20 >>> Regards, >>>=20 >>> [1] = http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-xen/2014-January/001974.html >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: [Fwd: New mailing lists] >>> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:26:57 +0000 >>> From: Ian Campbell >>> Organisation: Citrix Systems, Inc. >>> To: Julien Grall >>>=20 >>> Can you forward this to whoever @ NetBSD you think might be = interested? >>=20 >> Is NetBSD going to start using FDT now? >=20 > Good question, I think Ian meant FreeBSD here. ;) >=20 > --=20 > Julien Grall