Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 11 Feb 2016 13:37:59 +0100
From:      Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: pkg 1.6.3 unable to upgrade, URL in pkg.conf problem?
Message-ID:  <20160211123758.GM1141@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.1602101957110.23311@sea.ntplx.net>
References:  <Pine.GSO.4.64.1602101353240.22071@sea.ntplx.net> <AACBECC1-9E1A-4EB8-8D0A-8C94DFC99CCC@FreeBSD.org> <20160210223317.GH1141@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <Pine.GSO.4.64.1602101957110.23311@sea.ntplx.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--pFpMklMRdxwSC3Yi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 07:57:55PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>=20
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:16:44PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> >> On 10 Feb 2016, at 20:10, Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm trying to upgrade my ports with a set that I built using poudrier=
e.
> >>> I'm running FreeBSD-current r295354, pkg 1.6.3.
> >>>
> >>> The packages are here on my local (localhost, vega) box:
> >>>
> >>>  /usr/local/poudriere/data/packages/11amd64-default
> >>>
> >>> My repo pkg.conf (vega.conf) looks like this:
> >>>
> >>>  vega: {
> >>>    url: "file://localhost/usr/local/poudriere/data/packages/11amd64-d=
efault",
> >>
> >> Try using file:/// (e.g three slashes).  Yes, this is ugly, and Tim
> >> Berners-Lee has even apologized for it... :-) [1]
> >>
> >> -Dimitry
> >>
> >> [1] http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8306631.stm
> >>
> > Yes that is it.
> >
> > Note that I will relax it in pkg 1.6.4 to be released very soon, I have=
 been too
> > strict by accident in pkg 1.6.3 (I have never thought anyone would use =
file://
> > or file:/.
> >
> > pkg respects RFC2396 but there are not reason not to relax it a bit giv=
en some
> > users seems to use the previous syntax
>=20
> No worries, now that I have the correct syntax.  Thanks!

FYI pkg 1.6.4 is out and relaxes the syntax

Best regards,
Bapt

--pFpMklMRdxwSC3Yi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=ZnId
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pFpMklMRdxwSC3Yi--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160211123758.GM1141>