Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:05:54 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent massive port update. Message-ID: <4B6DCBA2.5030202@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <4B6D3D80.5000400@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <1781265383542@webmail54.yandex.ru> <20100206004206.5b87b5ee@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <01qv37-4ho2.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <4B6D3D80.5000400@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Seaman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/02/2010 09:40, Heino Tiedemann wrote: > >> Shouldn't there be an entry in UPDATING, that "jpeg" has to be >> rebuildet first? >> >> I rebuilded everything - but i have no idea about the order aof port >> reinstalling. > > Actually that's not necessary in this case entirely because the commit > was so large. Every port that needs to be rebuilt because it depends > on libjpeg has had it's PORTREVISION bumped. That means that if you > just do a 'portupgrade -a' or 'portmaster -a' the right thing will > happen automatically. No metter if there is revision bump or not, it should be in UPDATING as it was in case of jpeg-7. 20090719: AFFECTS: users of graphics/jpeg AUTHOR: dinoex@FreeBSD.org The IJG jpeg library has been updated to version 7.0. Please rebuild all ports that depend on it. Miroslav Lachman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B6DCBA2.5030202>