Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 10:29:25 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org> To: Sean Chittenden <seanc@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Small UID patch for the porters handbook... Message-ID: <20020817102925.A234@marduk.blackend.org> In-Reply-To: <20020816182448.GI15682@ninja1.internal>; from seanc@FreeBSD.org on Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 11:24:48AM -0700 References: <20020816102507.GH15682@ninja1.internal> <20020816103912.GA20839@idoru.tenten> <1029513110.324.16.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <20020816182448.GI15682@ninja1.internal>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 11:24:48AM -0700, Sean Chittenden wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 03:25:07AM -0700, Sean Chittenden said: > > > > Can someone approve/review the attached bit for the porters handbook > > > > and adding the Jabber UID? Thanks. -scx > > > > > > The patch is fine, but I think Joe Marcus Clarke had reserved uid 92 for > > > gdm - I'd check with him (his freefall login is marcus). > > > > I have asked for this, and I'd like a doc committer to commit my > > patch. However, if it's okay for me to do, I'll take care of it. I > > already have gdm and gdm2 using uid:gid 92 in the ports tree, so I'd > > like to keep it if possible. > > Heh, guess we're in the same boat. I personally give gdm a higher > weight of importance though. I'll update my doc patch and port to use > UID 93 then. How does this look? -sc > In a doc point of view the patch seems Ok, but for the uid etc. I can't say anything :) Marc PS: I *cleant* the Cc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020817102925.A234>