Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 12:47:29 +0700 From: John Indra <maverick@office.naver.co.id> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Subject: Re: malloc() and the stock Perl in -CURRENT (and -STABLE) Message-ID: <20020314124729.E8244@office.naver.co.id> In-Reply-To: <20020314052810.GH74829@elvis.mu.org>; from bright@mu.org on Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 09:28:10PM -0800 References: <20020314104525.B8244@office.naver.co.id> <20020314052810.GH74829@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 09:28:10PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >FreeBSD 5.0 has (being a developer release) has special diagnostics >turned on in malloc that causes it to take more time to do allocations. But... it DOESN'T only happen in -CURRENT. Even Raistlin Majere <raistlin@e-raist.com> is using a -STABLE or a -RELEASE maybe (he doesn't state his uname output in the message). And to confirm, I have just run the script with FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE of Nov 24th 2001: 44 secs! Awfully slow! (Perl 5.005_03 built from buildworld) And... let me tell you more. I run the script in -CURRENT who has: $ ll /etc/malloc.conf lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 2 Feb 8 14:08 /etc/malloc.conf -> aj This is a "fresh" -CURRENT (Mar 13th 2002) with Perl 5.6.0 built from buildworld. And to clarify things... I don't know what's wrong with malloc() in -CURRENT and -STABLE (and I don't even know whether it's even "wrong"). All I want is to let the Perl maintainer in -CURRENT and -STABLE to compile the stock Perl with its own malloc library, thus Perl in FreeBSD doesn't suffer from this kind of slowness. Thanks... >-Alfred /john "I go, I fight, and I win!" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020314124729.E8244>