Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:13:42 -0400 From: "Jason J. Hellenthal" <jasonh@DataIX.net> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, Thomas Backman <serenity@exscape.org> Subject: Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions Message-ID: <20090815161342.28932adc.jasonh@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <4A871560.70202@FreeBSD.org> References: <B787D58E-9157-48E7-ADF3-E8D54F8AF22F@exscape.org> <4A86FF1E.1030705@quip.cz> <6B5B7698-CCD8-48FF-A5FB-0349D4CC1143@exscape.org> <20090815154851.be2ac5a7.jasonh@DataIX.net> <4A871560.70202@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:06:56 -0700 Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Jason J. Hellenthal wrote: > > > Why not just add weekly_status_pkg_enable="YES" to /etc/periodic.conf.local and youll be informed of packages that need updating. > > Sorry to pick on your response, but this thread is a good time to > remind people of some basic mailing list etiquette: No its not a problem at all I must have missed part of the thread and picked up the portion where pkg_version was being discussed. > > 1. Read the whole thread before you reply (the suggestion you made > above was already made earlier in this thread). > > 2. Make sure you understand the real problem before you reply (the OP > has some sort of problem with his INDEX and ports tree not matching, > we've moved past just finding out what needs updating). > > 3. Don't speculate. If you're not 100% sure about something let > someone who is more knowledgeable reply. There have been several posts > in this thread that gave misleading and/or confusing information that > could easily have been avoided. > > > hth, > > Doug > > -- > > This .signature sanitized for your protection > -- Jason J. Hellenthal +1.616.403.8065 jasonh@DataIX.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090815161342.28932adc.jasonh>