From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 17 14:00:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF46106566B for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:00:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4538FC25 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:00:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6HE0IKa079854; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:00:18 +0800 (KRAST) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: (from eugen@localhost) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m6HE0Ipf079853; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:00:18 +0800 (KRAST) (envelope-from eugen) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:00:18 +0800 From: Eugene Grosbein To: Chuck Swiger Message-ID: <20080717140018.GA91530@svzserv.kemerovo.su> References: <20080716162042.GA27666@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <487E312E.9090307@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20080717035155.GA81536@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <8DFF6DCD-6619-4251-9944-59CED8DF1B19@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8DFF6DCD-6619-4251-9944-59CED8DF1B19@mac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: named.conf: query-source address X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:00:22 -0000 On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:06:33PM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote: > >Isn't this common to have multiple aliases at an interface? > >Sometimes only one of them should be used for all DNS traffic. > > About the only common reason to set up multiple aliases on an > interface is when you're doing something like hosting multiple SSL > webservers on a single box which actually need to have distinct IPs as > a consequence. Other than that, using public IPs for aliases is > usually wasteful of IP address space. YMMV... Think about multiple IP-based services (not HTTP "virtual" servers) at one physical host that should use distinct IP addresses for some reasons (local policy/billing/monitoring/etc.) Eugene Grosbein