Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 16:23:32 +0200 From: JosC <bsduser@cloudzeeland.nl> To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Ports upgrade script Message-ID: <a8dfe6e8-dc62-6ecf-c7d1-d4902140f708@cloudzeeland.nl> In-Reply-To: <20160416122425.b603d040.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <2daca22c-7719-0776-fbe8-3c37021298bf@cloudzeeland.nl> <20160416122425.b603d040.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In een bericht van 16-4-2016 12:24: > Use either portsnap (binary upgrade) or svn (source upgrade) to keep > your ports collection current. In your specific case, I'd probably be > a good idea to entirely remove /usr/ports (or rename it) and start > with a fresh copy, to be obtained by _one_ of the two methods. Thanks for your suggestion - what I don't understand is why my /user/src folder is emty. Is that normal using portsnap? BR, Jos Chrispijn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a8dfe6e8-dc62-6ecf-c7d1-d4902140f708>