From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Oct 31 16:20:03 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA18902
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 16:20:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA18857
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 16:20:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by root.com (8.7.6/8.6.5) with SMTP id QAA19393; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 16:18:59 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199611010018.QAA19393@root.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
cc: Nate Williams <nate@trout.mt.sri.com>, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: New Intel EtherExpress Pro/10 driver 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 31 Oct 1996 13:01:36 PST."
             <6189.846795696@time.cdrom.com> 
From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
Reply-To: dg@root.com
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 16:18:59 -0800
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>I think we need this in both branches.  The driver in -stable and
>-current is so broken that nothing jmrueda could do will have made it
>any worse. :-)

   This is not a replacement for the EE16 (if_ix) driver. The Pro/10 is a
differnet animal entirely.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project