From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Nov 23 10:40:53 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D38C37B7
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 10:40:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from tampoco.espindola.nl (tampoco.espindola.nl [149.210.133.191])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99AB32198
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 10:40:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (corfu.internal.deze.org [192.168.1.2])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: frank)
 by tampoco.espindola.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6EFA371FE1
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 11:30:17 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <529083BA.7060601@deze.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 11:30:18 +0100
From: Frank Volf <frank@deze.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20131118 Thunderbird/17.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Building ports in jails after staging support
References: <52862B79.5060603@deze.org>
In-Reply-To: <52862B79.5060603@deze.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 10:40:53 -0000


Anybody for this question?
I'm really struggling with it.

Regards,

Frank

Op 15-11-2013 15:11, Frank Volf schreef:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm having a FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE system with some jails.
> The jails have problems building/upgrading ports after staging support 
> was added to the /usr/ports tree.
> I'm using portupgrade for the upgrades (but that is not political, if 
> another tool does the job then that is fine as well).
>
>  I searched the archives of this list and if I understood that there 
> are two problem areas:
> 1) All jails share a union-mounted read-only copy of the /usr/ports 
> tree, and staging tries by default to write in /usr/ports
> 2) My jails are build according to the description in the FreeBSD 
> handbook and the symbolic link in the jails that points usr/local to 
> ../s/usr-local is causing problems as well.
>
> I found several messages from people describing work-arounds (e.g. 
> setting PACKAGES or NO_STAGE in /etc/make.conf), adjusting PREFIX in 
> pkgtools.conf.
> Some messages seem to be contradicting each other (like NO_STAGE 
> should not be defined), and some solution only solve one of the two 
> problems.
>
> So, my question is simply: is there an official (future proof) way how 
> to fix this? In other words, what should I do to get portupgrade or 
> any other port mgmt tool working again in the jails with my setup?
>
> Regards,
>
> Frank
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"