From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Apr  8 14:40:11 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id OAA26141
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 14:40:11 -0700
Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA26133
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 14:40:07 -0700
Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.11/8.6.10) id PAA26018; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 15:39:19 -0600
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 1995 15:39:19 -0600
Message-Id: <199504082139.PAA26018@trout.sri.MT.net>
To: Brian Tao <taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw>
Cc: FREEBSD-CURRENT-L <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: man(1) bug
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.91.950409045746.2012C-100000@aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw>
References: <199504081926.MAA15834@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
	<Pine.BSI.3.91.950409045746.2012C-100000@aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw>
Reply-To: nate@sneezy.sri.com (Nate Williams)
From: nate@sneezy.sri.com (Nate Williams)
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Brian Tao writes:
>     Here's a simple patch that fixes the manpage-starting-with-a-number
> bug and the can't-find-the-[-man-page-bug.  The second fix is really
> kludgy at the moment

Thanks for doing this, and I hate to be obnoxious, but can you re-send
your diffs and:
1) Use context diffs for the patch so we can make sure we're patching
   the correct portion of the code.  It also helps to see the context of
   the patch.  Use 'diff -c'.
2) Separate out the 'kludgy' fix from the not-so-kludgy so we can
   install the good fix and try and improve on the second. :)

Thanks!


Nate