From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 4 12:23:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D877968; Thu, 4 Jul 2013 12:23:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA32E11C4; Thu, 4 Jul 2013 12:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r64CMwPC046631; Thu, 4 Jul 2013 16:22:58 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 16:22:58 +0400 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: ZFS default compression algo for contemporary FreeBSD versions Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 04 Jul 2013 16:22:58 +0400 (MSK) Cc: avg@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 12:23:00 -0000 Collegues, is it sane to just set 'zfs compression=on dataset' to achieve best algo on fresh FreeBSD systems (-current and/or stable/9)? The manual page is a bit uncertain about this... -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------