From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Aug 4 20:43:48 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id UAA21685 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 4 Aug 1995 20:43:48 -0700 Received: from pluto.ops.NeoSoft.com (pluto.ops.NeoSoft.COM [198.64.212.23]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA21679 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 1995 20:43:46 -0700 Received: from concorde.neosoft.com (root@concorde.NeoSoft.COM [198.65.161.214]) by pluto.ops.NeoSoft.com (8.6.10/8.6.10) with ESMTP id WAA29508; Fri, 4 Aug 1995 22:43:39 -0500 Received: (from dbaker@localhost) by concorde.neosoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.11) id WAA00508; Fri, 4 Aug 1995 22:43:33 -0500 Date: Fri, 4 Aug 1995 22:43:30 -0500 (CDT) From: Daniel Baker X-Sender: dbaker@concorde.neosoft.com To: Joe Nieten cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help on /dev/psm0 i/o address conflict In-Reply-To: <199508041638.LAA00125@mudman.ghgcorp.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: questions-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 4 Aug 1995, Joe Nieten wrote: > I just installed 2.0.5 on one of my machines, and, now I cannot get X to work > properly. I've traced the problem to dmesg telling me that psm0 is conflicting > with sc0. This did not happen in 2.0 ... how do I fix this? If I cannot use my > /dev/psm0 I cannot use X and that makes my machine useless. Do I need to go back > to 2.0? > > Joe > Make sure you have these lines exactly in your kernel config: options "ALLOW_CONFLICT_IOADDR" device psm0 at isa? port "IO_KBD" tty conflicts irq 12 vector psmintr notice: the word 'psmintr' is supposed to be on the 2nd line, not on it's own. ++If you're cool, you run FreeBSD++ Daniel Baker -- NeoSoft Student Assistant (UseNet, FTP & CivNet Admin.) DBaker@NeoSoft.COM DBaker@Concorde-Mail.NeoSoft.COM (A FreeBSD Machine) ** http://www.neosoft.com/neosoft/staff/dbaker/default.html ** ++Get NeoSoft 'Net Access TODAY!!! 1/800-GET-NEOSOFT++