Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 7 Oct 2016 11:14:59 +0200
From:      "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
To:        Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net>
Cc:        FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: graphics/opencv2-core: compiler error on CURRENT: error: 'stddef.h'  file not found
Message-ID:  <20161007111459.164d5be7.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
In-Reply-To: <66A820DB-DAE0-41F6-BF36-4BB3C1AD465E@dsl-only.net>
References:  <66A820DB-DAE0-41F6-BF36-4BB3C1AD465E@dsl-only.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/OKfv.seSMNp/4MrVZGtTGdK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Am Fri, 7 Oct 2016 02:00:34 -0700
Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> schrieb:

> O. Hartmann ohartman at zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote on Fri Oct 7 08:26:27 UT=
C 2016 . . .
>=20
> . . . of having problems with not finding <stddef.h> during some port bui=
lds.
>=20
>=20
> Is there a difference in the -isystem command line options for c++ for th=
e working vs.
> failing contexts?
>=20
> I will presume that there is based on the following. . . (At least it giv=
es you
> something to look into.)
>=20
>=20
>=20
> The issue is not specific to just graphics/opencv-core and graphics/blend=
er ports:
> others also have problems with the use of -isystem for C++ compiles. See:
>=20
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213217
>=20
> in particular Comment #2 from Dimitry Andric.
>=20
> The problem is in how -isystem is used vs. what is needed for libc++ 3.8.=
0 .
>=20
> From O. Hartmann's message text:
>=20
> . . .
> > -isystem /usr/local/include/eigen3 -isystem /usr/include/include -O2 -p=
ipe -O3 =20
> . . .
> > In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/algorithm:624: In file includ=
ed
> > from /usr/include/c++/v1/initializer_list:47: /usr/include/c++/v1/cstdd=
ef:43:15: fatal
> > error: 'stddef.h' file not found #include_next <stddef.h> ^ --- =20
> . . .
> > In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/algorithm:624: In file includ=
ed
> > from /usr/include/c++/v1/initializer_list:47: /usr/include/c++/v1/cstdd=
ef:43:15: fatal
> > error: 'stddef.h' file not found #include_next <stddef.h> =20
>=20
>=20
> Dimitry wrote for this issue of <stddef.h> not being found:
>=20
> > Summary: If for some reason you must completely rebuild the header sear=
ch path
> > from scratch, you need to add  -isystem /usr/include/c++/v1 *before* -i=
system
> > /usr/include.  But it is better not to do this at all. :) =20
>=20
> There is more background/supporting information in that comment.
>=20
> =3D=3D=3D
> Mark Millard
> markmi at dsl-only.net

Hello Mark,

thanks a lot for the hint.

I can not fathom - at the moment - what is different on the two failing sys=
tems compared
to the non-failing ones. There must be something changing the order of how =
the include
path is searched now
- presumably I understood Dimitry Andric comment right (who explains the pr=
oblem very good
for my taste).

I will make a reference to Dimitri's comment on both PRs I filed.

Oliver

--Sig_/OKfv.seSMNp/4MrVZGtTGdK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX92eTAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8FI0H/iDjWp4xnt0j7trWQl9bXKp9
EVaoAKGFe0N7sBl5+GaeoEbGL2KRE5vf0QUzKcIP48ACEDJerfZ+89hgCkfc6AWR
xGzVdZFNKTUGkHBZRaFNsvOCtBv0X7t/8aUelReMQMA0CzFFsDEKsl+VihnVdZCt
N9gNfm0nO4YEDQ4gtrHWGLzAov0/NNVw3DFyJYpgEVdi3etCxdlVkVJGgswobtrK
q/v0jUDEGr/JsdhgDmeh0Urshu50xE6lgdBVU2uKeZt3baQAUn8QQcz+ydpu6O7v
/tDcw3BjiMG2dYVdfmA3NOT54NEJzsNcdqDsnO8uILkVx8sYwxnfHpLquN5JkWw=
=8NHv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/OKfv.seSMNp/4MrVZGtTGdK--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20161007111459.164d5be7.ohartman>