From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 06:02:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9B81065677; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:02:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from das@freebsd.org) Received: from zim.MIT.EDU (ZIM.MIT.EDU [18.95.3.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C9A8FC0C; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:02:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zim.MIT.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zim.MIT.EDU (8.14.5/8.14.2) with ESMTP id pAG62sKp002531; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 01:02:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from das@freebsd.org) Received: (from das@localhost) by zim.MIT.EDU (8.14.5/8.14.2/Submit) id pAG62sR6002530; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 01:02:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from das@freebsd.org) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 01:02:54 -0500 From: David Schultz To: Marcel Moolenaar Message-ID: <20111116060254.GA2460@zim.MIT.EDU> Mail-Followup-To: Marcel Moolenaar , Dimitry Andric , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org References: <201111152015.pAFKFwqb015331@svn.freebsd.org> <4EC2CFDD.7070206@FreeBSD.org> <20111115211449.GA476@zim.MIT.EDU> <69610C67-D009-48B1-85A5-167D5E7CCFE3@xcllnt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <69610C67-D009-48B1-85A5-167D5E7CCFE3@xcllnt.net> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric Subject: Re: svn commit: r227538 - head/tools/build X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:02:55 -0000 On Tue, Nov 15, 2011, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2011, at 1:14 PM, David Schultz wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011, Dimitry Andric wrote: > >> Note all the final executables will use 'real' atomic operations. That > >> is, unless you compile with CPUTYPE?=i386, and I wish you the best of > >> luck in that case, you'll need it. :) > > > > I thought we dropped support for anything less than a 486DX years ago. > > That's besides the point. GCC by default targets i386 on older > FreeBSD versions, which means that GCC does not expand atomic > operations inline and simple emits calls for them. It's all > about how GCC behaves and it has nothing to do with whether we > support 80386 CPUs or not. Understood. I didn't realize that nobody dragged the default gcc target into the 1990's until 2009.