From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Nov 23 17:48:27 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA17311 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 17:48:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from java.dpcsys.com (java.dpcsys.com [206.16.184.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA17305 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 17:48:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@dpcsys.com) Received: from localhost (dan@localhost) by java.dpcsys.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id RAA25392; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 17:48:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 17:48:23 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Busarow To: Hauan David NFIII 92SVS/SVFS 657-5922 cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Netmask matter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 23 Nov 1998, Hauan David NFIII 92SVS/SVFS 657-5922 wrote: > For those who block xxx... > > Wouldn't his network need to be aaa.bbb.ccc.8 and broadcast aaa.bbb.ccc.15? > Perhaps he is not on the implied subnet? Those who block xxx don't deserve an answer :) I had the broadcast wrong, .15 is correct. But the netmask should be aaa.bbb.ccc.248, the network is aaa.bbb.ccc.8 And since the IP range he gave is slightly off (9-13) it may not be a CIDR block. But the CIDR mask is more likely to work than a full C mask given the range. Dan -- Dan Busarow 949 443 4172 Dana Point Communications, Inc. dan@dpcsys.com Dana Point, California 83 09 EF 59 E0 11 89 B4 8D 09 DB FD E1 DD 0C 82 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message