From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 17 11:16:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87184106564A for ; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 11:16:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f49.google.com (mail-pz0-f49.google.com [209.85.210.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE348FC0C for ; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 11:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so4199552pzk.8 for ; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 04:16:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=UTlpDjSglw+v+FMdxt6DT4XQqdBBWj9FuqsdP8pUEzo=; b=SVQmh92QFWKHRQpmVjO4/VrOIt2zt9L0Zp1CQg8mU3LLmVV5Ny7QpRI9MtVFN6BdYs DOX4BETfvTnCxFgQ3Njcj2CFoOuB+A+Piv5fwvk5Bd6ijj4qk5Xa41U2aGj911PaPRzp gweulEDCD1RY5p3g9B+zEt0T5aQgzwHNaY/Hc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.13.101 with SMTP id g5mr6323459pbc.238.1310901383404; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 04:16:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.40.72 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 04:16:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1310897269.93980.10.camel@server.intern.prnet.org> References: <1310897269.93980.10.camel@server.intern.prnet.org> Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 07:16:23 -0400 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: David Arendt , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: options used to compile packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 11:16:24 -0000 On 7/17/11, David Arendt wrote: > When I did the test, I used FreeBSD 8.2 amd64 using the ports collection > delivered with this distribution. > I see. Since that time, there have been very few changes to the version of the base system used to build the packages for 8, but more to some of the ports that you mentioned, so probably the difference that you observed is due to the latter, if it isn't caused by some local change on your own system. > Yesterday I did a checkout of the latest ports tree. I compiled bash, > xorg, xfce and gdm using the default options. When trying to login using > gdm, it still complains about a missing keyring pam module. When I > disable keyring support in gdm, gdm runs flawlessly. Therefore I thought > that options used to compile the offical packages might be different. If > default options are used to compile them, it should be a some other > problem. To ensure that my build environment is not polluted, I did this > test on a fresh installation. But anyway it doesn't matter as I have a > workaround. If you believe that the error arises from a problem other than your particular configuration of gdm and its dependencies, or at least is likely to affect others, then it would be helpful if you submitted a problem report: http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html after having first looked to see if a similar problem has already been reported, via: http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=&severity=&priority=&class=&state=&sort=none&text=&responsible=&multitext=pam&originator=&release= or other searches of your own. b.