From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 4 19:20:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9923716A4E5 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2006 19:20:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3BB43F1A for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2006 19:17:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GVCEs-0008T0-Hy for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2006 21:17:08 +0200 Received: from 83-131-171-55.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([83.131.171.55]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Oct 2006 21:17:06 +0200 Received: from ivoras by 83-131-171-55.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Oct 2006 21:17:06 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 21:16:36 +0200 Lines: 8 Message-ID: References: <451FE7F4.8020907@desk.pl> <200610031459.00258.jhb@freebsd.org> <20061004180607.GA68246@icarus.home.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 83-131-171-55.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) In-Reply-To: <20061004180607.GA68246@icarus.home.lan> Sender: news Subject: Re: vmstat -i output after solving snd problems. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 19:20:45 -0000 Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > I was feeling proactive and took a look at the vmstat code, which is > an amazing piece of work (take my comment however you wish, because it > has multiple implications). Yeah, I see it. It will become a member of a collection of examples for the "why-80-line-barrier-in-style(9)-is-evil" campaign.