From owner-cvs-all Wed Jun 10 06:49:51 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA02488 for cvs-all-outgoing; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 06:49:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (spinner.netplex.com.au [202.12.86.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA01571; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 06:45:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spinner.netplex.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8/Spinner) with ESMTP id VAA06264; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 21:45:02 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from peter@spinner.netplex.com.au) Message-Id: <199806101345.VAA06264@spinner.netplex.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Bruce Evans cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-sys@FreeBSD.ORG, dt@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/msdosfs msdosfs_vnops.c In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 10 Jun 1998 22:09:31 +1000." <199806101209.WAA17030@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 21:45:02 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Bruce Evans wrote: [..] > Chflags doesn't have so much history beind not returning EOPNOTSUPP, but > EOPNOTSUPP is not mentioned in chflags.2 and EINVAL is documented as the > error for fchflags() on a socket. EOPNOTSUPP is what is returned by the "other" BSD's. I feel that there is a difference between giving a nonsense (invalid) argument, and the flags case where the backing fs can't support the valid request you've made. > Bruce Cheers, -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message