From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Dec 21 09:49:05 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA8713436B8 for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 09:49:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 716B48EC13 for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 09:49:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id wBL9REJL003309 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 21 Dec 2018 10:27:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: [SOLVED] Re: Back again on Ryzen stability To: Erich Dollansky Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <42a7a149-fa6b-390f-eb13-e10b437baaf7@netfence.it> <20181204122348.131f9471.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> <3cef02cc-fc6a-4570-c374-6f8c8ee3d192@netfence.it> <20181204192129.622c8779.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <2c474b0c-46c3-72dd-ca1f-02edbec41673@netfence.it> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 10:27:14 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181204192129.622c8779.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 716B48EC13 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.40 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.56)[-0.558,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.02)[country: IT(0.08)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[netfence.it]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.17)[-0.169,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mx.netfence.it,mx.netfence.it,mx.netfence.it,mx.netfence.it,mx.netfence.it,mx.netfence.it,mx.netfence.it,mx.netfence.it]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.58)[-0.576,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 09:49:05 -0000 On 12/4/18 12:21 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote: > I just followed this mailing list and read some random articles. There > seem to be no real stability problems which cannot be explained by other > things like faulty motherboards etc. Hello. Just in case it helps others, I think I can conclude my new Ryzen 7 system works fine: uptime is almost a week, with high and low load cycles (some idle time, some Poudriere, some server work, etc...). I'm still running 11.2, BTW. bye av.